Instructional Strategy

INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY

Socratic Dialogue

Grade:

6-8, 9-12

Type:

Discuss & Collaborate

/ Question & Inquire

> 40

Minutes

When:

Before, during, and after reading

Materials:

Socratic Dialogue graphic organizer, selected text and guiding questions, whiteboard or display, writing utensils

Description

The Socratic Dialogue strategy engages students in collaborative dialogue to analyze complex ideas, explore diverse perspectives, and apply ethical reasoning to real-world issues. Students prepare for and participate in a structured discussion that promotes critical thinking, active listening, and respectful communication. This strategy supports students in developing flexible thinking and informed decision-making by encouraging them to connect evidence, values, and viewpoints through inquiry-based conversation.

Procedure

Select a relevant topic and text aligned with your current unit or essential question (e.g., “What responsibilities do humans have toward the environment?”). Consider selecting a text from Britannica School or another Britannica product of your choice.

Develop 5–10 open-ended, text-dependent guiding questions that require critical analysis and ethical reflection. These should encourage reasoning, evidence use, and perspective-taking.

Distribute the Socratic Dialogue graphic organizer, and ask students to complete the first box as they read, recording their main conclusions and supporting evidence. Consider assigning this for students to complete before class.

Introduce the Socratic seminar structure by explaining expectations for respectful dialogue, active listening, and evidence-based discussion. Model how to build on others’ ideas and how to disagree constructively.

Invite students to arrange chairs in a circle. Assign optional roles such as note-taker, timekeeper, and discussion facilitator to ensure equitable participation.

Display the Socratic Dialogue graphic organizer. Tell students that during the Socratic seminar they should write down questions, ideas, text-based evidence, and opposing viewpoints in the second box of the graphic organizer.

Begin the seminar with your guiding questions. Encourage students to use their notes and cite evidence as they exchange ideas. Prompt them to listen actively, acknowledge differing viewpoints, and extend the conversation with probing questions.

As the discussion develops, facilitate rather than lead—ask clarifying or synthesizing questions to help students deepen reasoning and connect ideas.

Wrap up with reflection. Have students complete the third box of their graphic organizer, summarizing key insights, noting how their thinking evolved, and identifying ethical or practical implications.

Provide feedback on students’ participation, focusing on their ability to think critically, communicate respectfully, and use evidence effectively.

Differentiation

Model Expectations: Before beginning, model effective dialogue techniques, such as taking turns, summarizing others’ points, and using evidence to support claims. Provide sentence starters (e.g., “I hear your point, and I’d like to add…” or “One ethical question this raises is…”). This modeling supports learners by making expectations explicit, reducing anxiety, and giving them concrete tools to participate confidently in academic conversations.

Student-Led Socratic Seminar: Challenge advanced students to co-lead portions of the discussion, developing their facilitation and questioning skills. Provide feedback on students’ leadership and summarizing abilities. This empowers students to take ownership of their learning, deepens engagement, and strengthens metacognitive and communication skills that extend beyond the classroom.

Multilingual Learning Support

Beginning Proficiency: Offer students the opportunity to read the selected text both in English and in their home languages before class. Then, during the Socratic seminar, allow students to discuss complex ideas in their home languages to ensure they can effectively express their viewpoints.

Pre-teach important key vocabulary and concepts. For example, if the topic is climate change, consider teaching terms such as atmosphere and greenhouse effect.

Intermediate Proficiency: Offer students a word bank with sentence starters that are useful for agreeing and disagreeing (e.g., “I agree because…” / “I disagree because…” / “I hear your idea; however, I believe that…”). Before the Socratic seminar begins, have students practice using these phrases in conversation.

Advanced Proficiency: Give students the option of using a bilingual glossary as needed during the conversation. Provide more complex sentences to support students in effectively expressing their ideas (e.g., “According to the text…”).

Variations

Inner and Outer Circles: Consider varying the classroom setup. Instead of having one large circle, divide the class into two groups and have students organize their chairs in inner and outer circles. The students in the inner circle are the speakers, while the students in the outer circle take notes. Instruct the note-takers to give the speakers feedback at a good stopping point. Then have students switch roles.

5 Plays for AI-Powered Planning

In the News