Instructional Strategy

Britannica Education logo in blue square

INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY

Semantic Feature Analysis

Grade:

K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12, UNIV

Type:

Acquire Vocabulary
/ Develop Language (MLL)
20-30

Minutes

When:

Before and during reading

Materials:

Semantic Feature Analysis graphic organizer, whiteboard or display, writing utensil
Chat bubble with list icon in green on white background

Description

Colorful pins connected by strings forming network on blue background.
© anilakkus— iStock / Getty Images Plus/Getty Images
The Semantic Feature Analysis is a strategy that helps students explore how words and ideas are related to each other, building both vocabulary and comprehension. Students draw on prior knowledge to complete a matrix with words on one side and traits on the other. Using this strategy, students can see connections—similarities and differences—that can lead to deeper analysis.
Curved arrows forming square in orange on white background

Procedure

Prepare for the Activity: Carefully select vocabulary words that are crucial to understanding the topic, and determine the key features of the topic to include on one axis of the matrix (see example, below). This preparatory step will guide students as they analyze and connect the vocabulary with the topic during the reading.
1
Since some knowledge of the words is necessary to complete the matrix, introduce the words to students. This can be done by engaging students in an initial reading of the text or by previewing the vocabulary words.
2
Provide students with a Semantic Feature Analysis graphic organizer. This is a matrix that lists vocabulary words on one axis and features of the topic on the other.
3
Encourage students to engage in a second read. This time, as students read, have them place a “+” sign in the matrix cells where a vocabulary word aligns with a particular feature of the topic. Have them put a “-” sign in the corresponding cell if the word does not align. If they are unsure of the relationship or it is not applicable, they should leave the cell blank.
4
Ask students to analyze their matrix and develop three conclusions or ideas. Have them share and discuss their findings and observations with the class or in small groups.
a)
This should involve explaining the characteristics that led them to mark “+” or “-” for each word and feature.
b)
Encourage students to discuss any differences in their matrices compared to their peers.
c)
Students should aim to understand different perspectives and interpretations of the vocabulary words and their attributes.
5
After students have engaged in the analysis and discussion, encourage them to reflect on their learning and revisit their matrices.
a)
This step allows them to consider any changes they might want to make based on insights gained during discussions.
b)
Prompt students to use the text to reread and clarify any points of confusion or to reinforce their understanding.
6
Have students write a summary that reflects their understanding of the vocabulary and its relationship to the topic, based on their analysis and the group discussions.
Expanding arrows icon in white on purple background

Differentiation

Think-Aloud: Using a think-aloud strategy, scaffold the Semantic Feature Analysis activity by vocalizing your thought process while selecting relevant vocabulary and determining key features for the matrix. This helps students understand how to critically engage with the text and the matrix, demonstrating how to analyze the alignment of vocabulary with topic features during reading and discussion. This approach supports students in forming and articulating their conclusions during the analysis and summary writing phases.
Student-Led Matrix Design: Assign a specific category to students and invite them to plan and create their own Semantic Feature Analysis matrix. This requires students to independently identify relevant vocabulary and determine appropriate features, fostering critical thinking and creativity in structuring their analysis.

Multilingual Learning Support

Beginning Proficiency: Support students’ vocabulary understanding by creating a bilingual semantic feature matrix that includes translations of key words and features in both English and students’ home language. For example, if analyzing animals, the matrix might include “mammal/mamĂ­fero“ and “has fur/tiene pelo.” Introduce symbols beyond just “+” and “-“: use small pictures or emojis to show relationships (e.g., a checkmark, an X, and a question mark). Create a bilingual word wall that pairs each vocabulary term with its translation, a pronunciation guide, and a simple image. When students discuss their matrices, allow them to explain their thinking in their home language first, and then help them bridge to English using sentence frames like “This word has/doesn’t have…” / “Esta palabra tiene/no tiene…” or “I marked plus because…” / “MarquĂ© más porque…”.
Intermediate Proficiency: Enhance the semantic analysis by providing cognate connections where possible (e.g., “carnivore/carnĂ­voro,” “herbivore/herbĂ­voro”) and creating dual-language feature descriptions. Support students in explaining their matrix choices using more complex sentence structures (e.g., “I noticed that these words share the feature of…” / “Me di cuenta que estas palabras comparten la caracterĂ­stica de…” or “The relationship between these words is…” / “La relaciĂłn entre estas palabras es…”). During group discussions, encourage students to compare and contrast features using academic language while allowing them to clarify concepts in their home language when needed.
Advanced Proficiency: Deepen semantic understanding by having students analyze nuanced relationships between words and features in both languages. Have them explain subtle distinctions using sophisticated academic language (e.g., “While both terms exhibit…they differ in…” / “Aunque ambos tĂ©rminos muestran…se diferencian en…” or “This feature is characteristic of…because…” / “Esta caracterĂ­stica es propia de…porque…”). During matrix analysis, encourage students to serve as language bridges, helping peers understand complex relationships between words and features while drawing connections between academic vocabulary in both languages. When students write their final summaries, allow them to draft in their home language first. Then encourage them to create polished versions in both languages, focusing on academic vocabulary and precise relationship descriptions.
Overlapping documents icon in light blue on white background

Variations

Interactive Digital Matrices: Utilize digital tools to create interactive matrices where students can drag and drop items, add notes, and even incorporate multimedia elements directly related to the vocabulary words and their features. Consider incorporating a digital matrix tool that displays student results at a glance, facilitating immediate feedback and prompting in-depth discussion and analysis. This enables you to quickly identify areas of strength and improvement, enhancing students’ learning experience.
© Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.